Skip to main content

Sleepy Hollow: A Gothic Tale

One of then first rules of costume design is that it has to feel integrated within the aesthetic choices of the movie. It has to work with the cinematography and the set design. This gets harder when you're working with a director who has a very particular and personal (and weird) vision and look. A director like, let's say, Tim Burton.


Burton has a very particular style and every single element in the frame needs to work towards achieving that style. Perhaps that's why he tends to collaborate repeatedly with specific professionals. Like Colleen Atwood.

Atwood is a heavy weight of costume design in and on itself; having worked in over 50 movies throughout her career. She's been nominated for an Academy Award eleven times, winning three times (2002's Chicago, 2005's Memoirs of a geisha and 2010's Alice in Wonderland). She's also worked in movies like; Wyatt Earp (1994), Little Women (1994), Public Enemies (2009) and the recent Into the Woods (2014). But she's most famous with her collaborations with director Tim Burton, having worked with him in over seven movies. Among those are; Edward Siccorhands (1990), Ed Wood (1994), Mars Attack! (1994) and Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street (2007).

But my personal favorite collaboration is, undoubtedly, 1999's Sleepy Hollow. A Hammer-like take on Washington Irving's classic horror tale.


The movie's visual style opts for an almost monochromatic effect designed to enhance the fantasy aspect of the story. This, obviously, affects the costume design. Opting for such a cinematography prevents any color from really popping out, and so, the costumes need to focus on texture, shape and pattern, practically casting aside the most important element at play in any design: color.

Another important element is the fact that the movie is set in 1799, making it, theoretically, a period piece. So, how do you do a period piece, taking into account that it's supposed to be fantasy and where you can't really use color?

THE PERIOD FACTOR

Sleepy Hollow takes into account the period, but most of the designs are goth-ized, for lack of a better word. It definitely focusses more on the gothic than on the history, but it's what the movie needs.

All this basically was a way of saying that we won't focus on accuracy. It's pointless in a movie about a witch who controls a headless man in order to get her husbands fat inheritance.

ICHABOD



Ichabod has about three outfits through the movie, and all of them are consistently black and white. Choosing such a monochromatic palette is ideal if you're working with the almost monochrome effect that Burton chose. So it's a logical choice.


The textures are incredible, they feel very real and are used to compensate the lack of color. And it helps to avoid the feeling that they dressed him in a Halloween costume, it makes the dress feel real.


The simplicity of his wardrobe is really what the character needed: it's a stern look, because Ichabod is someone who doesn't take things lightly or who is too prone to jokes. The clothes are simple, humble, austere, because he is not rich, so his designs do not use elaborate fabrics. He's a practical man; logic rules his life. This is underlined by the design, creating a contrast between his simplicity and the richly embroidered clothes of the superstitious villagers.

On top of that, the design needed to give a certain vibe. Ichabod is supposed to be the gothic hero (a very cowardly one, but still), so certain elements of the design were very much needed: the preeminence of black, the high boots.... It's all about easy identification.

It's also, in my opinion, a huge homage to the Hammer hero. Burton has repeatedly stated that he is a big fan of Hammer movies and so, this seems only logical.


KATRINA VON TASSEL

Dressing the ladies is always way more fun, one must admit. And so is talking about their dresses.


Katrina is supposed to be the daughter of the richest man in Sleepy Hollow and also happens to be a good witch. Perfect ingredients for a fun design; the fact that she's rich allows the designer to play with more elaborate fabrics and as a woman (and a witch) the possibilities just skyrocket.

She has considerably more outfits than Ichabod (without reaching Padme levels, of course).


Katrina is a much romantic character than Ichabod; she reads romance novels and believes in witchcraft. And that is reflected in her costumes. She's mainly dressed in soft colors: pinks, golds and blues, underlining her romanticism.

The soft colors and the round shapes help to underline the damsel in distress feel of the character, and it also helps to create a contrast between her and Ichabod: heart and head. The sweet colors of love with stern colors of logic.

Peach gown

Another notable element of the design is its monochromatic element. Although she is  dressed in various colors, most of her design never mix palettes. The peach dress (seen above) is constructed in a varying palette of peach, but it has no other color. The blue dress (seen below) is constructed in only blues.

Blue, stripped gown

These monochromatic palettes helps the cinematography to achieve the look and feel that Burton wants for the movie. It makes it easier to desaturate and still look good.

It's only on rare occasions that a design breaks this rule, and these exceptions are only made when the color in question is red.

Blue cape

Here, the red in the roses shine through the blue. Why's that? Because red is the key color of the movie. I've you watch it again, notice that the only color that doesn't feel like it's almost black and white is the crimson red of the blood. This color is the only element that it's allowed to shine through the monochromatic effect. And that is, again, a nod to Hammer Horror films.


The blood used in these movies was very unique, because it was very intense, very fake, for lack of a better word. And it was the only color that shone through their movies. Burton does the same here, and Atwood finds a way to work the same idea into her designs.

Last but not least, is the progression of the designs. As Katrina gets closer to Ichabod and they both start (slowly) to see eye to eye, her designs start to move away from that softness and romanticism. The main element used for that is the patterns of the clothes she wears.

First, her default patterns are more flowery, more soft and nature related. For the peach dress (the one she's introduced in) they used embroidered flowers and stems. And for the pink dress (see picture below), they embroidered little pink flowers and soft curves.

Pink gown

But as the plot moves forward and she starts to get closer to Ichabod, more artificial patterns start to show up. Basically, flowers and soft lines are replaced by stripes (a much more Burtonesque element).


Her final gown, the one she wears as she moves to New York with Ichabod is the radical opposite of her initial peach dress; it's a black and white-stripe dress. She is closer to him, and that's how it's visualized.

Black and white stripped dress
Compare this final image of the two, with the first time we see them together.


The designs start being completely opposite and end up in perfect symbiosis. It's the best way to show visually that two characters have come together.

THE STEPMOTHER

Dressing the villain is almost as fun as dressing the ladies. And so, when the villain is a fabulous lady villain, the possibilities are endless.

Katrina's stepmother is also a witch, but not the good king of witch. More like the vengeful witch type. Hers is a rag to riches story, having lived with her twin sister in the woods as a child, she became a maid at the Van Tassel's home, and when Katrina's mother died, she found her way into her father's bed. All those elements are weaved one way or another into the costumes.

It's important to remark that, even though none of the designs of the movie is exactly accurate (historically speaking), her designs are the most anachronistic. But this is done in order to accentuate her character and her role on the movie, so it doesn't really bother me. Her whole look is meant to look over the top.


Her designs tend to be grander than life; bigger shapes, brighter colors.... Just look at the neckline in the dress shown above. It's theatrical.

This also helps accentuate the sense that she wasn't born to riches; the designs are tackier, bolder, something a wealthy woman (like Katrina) would never wear. It's based on the need to show off how rich you are.


Her dresses tend to integrate black with more vivid colors, creating patterns like those of a spider-web and creating an aura of strangeness around her. It's like the web of darkness and deceit that she is casting over the town.


This is taken to the extreme with her final gown; the black and white gown.


This is not a historical dress, at all. It's, in spirit, a very romantic design: it's fluffy, and big and so over the top... But that's what the character needs, it's her big reveal as the movie's villain, it had to be memorable. It had to be unique.

The design isn't based on Georgian fashion (as it should, according to the time period) but around the paintings of the Pre-Raphaelites.

Sidonia Von Bork (1860, Edward
Burne-Jones)
Vanity (1907, Frank Cadogan) 


The design takes the web idea and carries it to the extreme: the black net becomes this all surrounding web of darkness that ends up eating her alive (much the same way that the horseman ends up dragging her to hell).

A GOTHIC TALE

In the end, the most important element of the designs of this movie is the gothic element, so characteristic of Burton's work. And so that's the only guideline that really matters; not historical accuracy.

Everything in the frame needs to be according to the gothic vision of the director, and so the costume design focuses solely to work in that direction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Burning Question: What's wrong with Belle's gown?

Since the first promotional pictures of Disney's new Live-Action remake of Beauty and the Beast hit the internet, there has been a lot of discussion around Belle's iconic ball gown. And, even months after its release in cinemas, there still continues to be a lot of buzz around it. Why? Mainly, because a lot of people feel that it is just doesn't look that good.
The thing is, Belle's animated yellow ball gown is, at this point, an iconic staple of animated cinema. Everybody knows it and everybody loves it. And, as a result, everybody can see the new one and say "this is not the costume I know". Therefore, everyone can compare it down to the smallest detail and see that it just doesn't quite look right.
Today, our goal will be to try and dissect the design in order to answer the burning question everyone has been asking themselves: what's so wrong with the "new" dress? Or, to put it bluntly, why is it so incredibly underwhelming?

This might n…

Disney's Cinderella(s) and the evolution of the "princess" aesthetics

Every girl, at some point in life, has wanted to be a princess. It has become undeniable that the concept of the "princess" is, for better or worst, inseparable from girlhood. We live in a "princesses" obsessed era, and we have for a long time now. And a lot has been said about it, with loud people yelling over the internet about the positive and negative aspects of it. So it was about time for us to join the yelling contest, I guess.
If we're going to talk about princesses, the logical place to go is to the Global Mogul Conglomerate that has led the trend and, in many ways, defined it: Disney. They have, undeniably, redefined the fairytale and have turned the term "princess" into a best selling Licensed Entertainment Character Merchandise.

The thing is, even though princesses have been part of the fairy tale canon for a very long time, they didn't become the central figure until Walt Disney placed them there.
In the tales that the Grimm Brothers…

The Huntsman: Winter's War. Untangling the mess. Part II

As we heavily remarked in our last article (click here to read), the Costume Design for the monstrosity that was The Huntsman: Winter's War wasn't really as good as everyone was claiming it to be. And because we are sort of unrelenting in our grudges and hates, we are going to continue hammering down this idea, this time focussing on the true stars of this movie: the two Evil Sister Queens.
So, without further ado, let's get into the madness. IV. FREYA, THE ICE QUEEN That tonal dissonance that we pointed out in the huntsmen characters becomes a cacophony the moment we consider the two Queens in this movie: Ravenna (because how could they do this movie without bringing back the only successful character in the last movie?) and her sister, Freya, who basically becomes Elsa from Frozen.
Before starting, I feel like I need to clarify that my main quarrel about both their designs has nothing to do with if they are pretty or not, which most of them are. But prettiness is not wh…

Creating the Seven Kingdoms. Part I: The North

As we promised a few weeks backs, we are going to cover more tv shows from now on, mainly because there is just too much awesomeness in our TV's these days to ignore it. And for the last 5 years, the crowning jewel of TV costume design has been, without a doubt, HBO's Game of Thrones. So it was only logical to start there.
The downside is that there is so much to talk about that it becomes really difficult to decide where to start exactly. G.R.R. Martin's sprawling epic covers many characters and many places, and therefore there's really a lot to pick up from. In the end, we decided that we would take a page out of the author's tactics and split it in several different series of articles to be published gradually. And so, this is going to be the first of many. And we probably should warn you, there will be spoilers ahead. CREATING THE SEVEN KINGDOMSGame of Thrones, from an adaptation standpoint, faced many of the same problems that Peter Jackson had to face when b…

Oscars Retrospective 2017: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is the first of the planned spin-off/prequel series of the Harry Potter Saga and the screenwriting debut of J.K.Rowling, the mind behind the Harry Potter Books.
This new installment is an ambitious attempt, both in scale and in narrative, as it tries to tell both a brand new story with brand new characters and also be linked to the original saga through the character of Grindelwald.
The problem is that this juggling act forces the movie to fit in together two stories that have little to do with each other. On the one hand, there's Grindenwald and the Obscurial's story and on the other, the bizarre adventures of Newt Scamander as he tries to fetch back his creatures. Separately, these two stories, could have made for two entertaining movies, but the problem is that, together, they just don't mix  very well. On top of that, the radical changes in tone throughout the movie only manage to drag the final product further down.

But, despite…